Paper detail

In-plane oxygens in high-temperature superconducting cuprates

The role of the oxygen degree of freedom in the cuprates' superconducting planes is analyzed in detail. Structural and photoemission results are reviewed to show that the most sparse description of the in-plane electronic states requires explicit control of the oxygens. For metallic states, the relative contributions of oxygen and copper vary along the Fermi surface, with the arc metallicity dominantly oxygen-derived. For the magnetic responses, we find that the observed incommensurability arises naturally if one keeps separate the roles of the two sites. For the charge order in LBCO, we propose a scenario, based on magnetic interactions in the plane. We stress the need for further experimental investigations of the evolution of the intracell charge distribution with doping, and for a better theoretical understanding of the large particle-hole-symmetry breaking required for successful phenomenologies, but difficult to reconcile with ab initio calculations.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.