Paper detail

Impurity-induced shocks in the asymmetric exclusion process with long-range hopping

We consider the totally asymmetric simple exclusion process (TASEP) on the periodic chain in the presence of a single impurity site that is inaccessible to other particles and therefore acts as a static defect. Particles are allowed to advance any distance l \geq 1 on the right with the probability that decays as l^-(1+sigma), where sigma > 1. Despite the long range of hopping, we find the same type of phase transition that occurs in the standard short-range TASEP with a defect site where defect induces a macroscopic shock in the stationary state. In particular, our model displays two main features characteristic of the short-range TASEP with defect site: a growth of the shock width with system size L as L^(1/2) or L^(1/3), depending on the existence of the particle-hole symmetry, and the power-law decay in density profiles of the shock phase. However, unlike the profiles in the short-range case, we find that the latter are well reproduced by the mean-field approximation, which enables us to derive the analytical expression for sigma-dependent exponent nu = sigma-1 of this power-law decay and the point sigma_c = 4/3 at which the transition takes place.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.