Paper detail

Impurity-induced frustration: low-energy model of diluted oxides

We provide a detailed derivation of the low-energy model for Zn-diluted La2CuO4 in the limit of low doping together with a study of the ground-state properties of that model. We consider Zn-doped La2CuO4 within a framework of the three-band Hubbard model, which closely describes high-Tc cuprates on the energy scale of the most relevant atomic orbitals. Qualitatively, we find that the hybridization of zinc and oxygen orbitals can result in an impurity state with the energy \varepsilon, which is lower than the effective Hubbard gap U. The low-energy, spin-only Hamiltonian includes terms of the order t^2/U and t^4/\varepsilon^3. That is, besides the usual nearest-neighbor superexchange J-terms of order t^2/U, the low-energy model contains impurity-mediated, further-neighbor frustrating interactions among the Cu spins surrounding Zn-sites in an otherwise unfrustrated antiferromagnetic background. These terms can be substantial when \varepsilon ~ U/2, the latter value corresponding to the realistic CuO2 parameters. In order to verify this spin-only model, we subsequently apply the T-matrix approach to study the effect of impurities on the antiferromagnetic order parameter. Previous theoretical studies, which include only the dilution effect of impurities, show a large discrepancy with experimental data in the doping dependence of the staggered magnetization at low doping. We demonstrate that this discrepancy is eliminated by including impurity-induced frustrations into the effective spin model with realistic CuO2 parameters. Recent experimental study shows a significantly stronger suppression of spin stiffness in the case of Zn-doped La2CuO4 compared to the Mg-doped case and thus gives a strong support to our theory. We argue that the proposed impurity-induced frustrations should be important in other strongly correlated oxides and charge-transfer insulators.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.