Paper detail

Impurity effects in Cu$_2$O

The doping of wide gap semiconductors is an interesting problem both from the scientific and technological point of view. A well known example of this problem is the doping of Cu$_2$O. The only element which has produced an order of magnitude increase in the conductivity of Cu$_2$O bulk samples is chlorine, as previously reported by us and others. However the solar cells produced with this material do not show any improvement in performances because of the reduction in the minority carrier diffusion length. In this paper we investigate the effect of other impurities in order to check their possible use as dopants and to assess their effects on the minority carrier diffusion length. Seven impurities have been introduced by evaporation on the starting copper sheet before the oxidation used to produce Cu$_2$O: chromium (Cr), iron (Fe), silver (Ag), silicon (Si), sodium (Na), sulfur (S) and phosphorus (P). The experiments show that a 20 ppm of concentration of these dopants does not give any relevant effect neither on the resistivity, nor on the mobility. The effect on minority carrier diffusion length is also negligible except for sodium which produces a slight degradation of the samples.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.