Paper detail

Improving wafer-scale Josephson junction resistance variation in superconducting quantum coherent circuits

Quantum bits, or qubits, are an example of coherent circuits envisioned for next-generation computers and detectors. A robust superconducting qubit with a coherent lifetime of $O$(100 $μ$s) is the transmon: a Josephson junction functioning as a non-linear inductor shunted with a capacitor to form an anharmonic oscillator. In a complex device with many such transmons, precise control over each qubit frequency is often required, and thus variations of the junction area and tunnel barrier thickness must be sufficiently minimized to achieve optimal performance while avoiding spectral overlap between neighboring circuits. Simply transplanting our recipe optimized for single, stand-alone devices to wafer-scale (producing 64, 1x1 cm dies from a 150 mm wafer) initially resulted in global drifts in room-temperature tunneling resistance of $\pm$ 30%. Inferring a critical current $I_{\rm c}$ variation from this resistance distribution, we present an optimized process developed from a systematic 38 wafer study that results in $<$ 3.5% relative standard deviation (RSD) in critical current ($\equiv σ_{I_{\rm c}}/\left\langle I_{\rm c} \right\rangle$) for 3000 Josephson junctions (both single-junctions and asymmetric SQUIDs) across an area of 49 cm$^2$. Looking within a 1x1 cm moving window across the substrate gives an estimate of the variation characteristic of a given qubit chip. Our best process, utilizing ultrasonically assisted development, uniform ashing, and dynamic oxidation has shown $σ_{I_{\rm c}}/\left\langle I_{\rm c} \right\rangle$ = 1.8% within 1x1 cm, on average, with a few 1x1 cm areas having $σ_{I_{\rm c}}/\left\langle I_{\rm c} \right\rangle$ $<$ 1.0% (equivalent to $σ_{f}/\left\langle f \right\rangle$ $<$ 0.5%). Such stability would drastically improve the yield of multi-junction chips with strict critical current requirements.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.