Paper detail

Improving Unsupervised Sparsespeech Acoustic Models with Categorical Reparameterization

The Sparsespeech model is an unsupervised acoustic model that can generate discrete pseudo-labels for untranscribed speech. We extend the Sparsespeech model to allow for sampling over a random discrete variable, yielding pseudo-posteriorgrams. The degree of sparsity in this posteriorgram can be fully controlled after the model has been trained. We use the Gumbel-Softmax trick to approximately sample from a discrete distribution in the neural network and this allows us to train the network efficiently with standard backpropagation. The new and improved model is trained and evaluated on the Libri-Light corpus, a benchmark for ASR with limited or no supervision. The model is trained on 600h and 6000h of English read speech. We evaluate the improved model using the ABX error measure and a semi-supervised setting with 10h of transcribed speech. We observe a relative improvement of up to 31.4% on ABX error rates across speakers on the test set with the improved Sparsespeech model on 600h of speech data and further improvements when we scale the model to 6000h.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.