Paper detail

Improving tobacco social contagion models using agent-based simulations on networks

Over the years, population-level tobacco control policies have considerably reduced smoking prevalence worldwide. However, the rate of decline of smoking prevalence is slowing down. Therefore, there is a need for models that capture the full complexity of the smoking epidemic. These models can then be used as test-beds to develop new policies to limit the spread of smoking. Current models of smoking dynamics mainly use ordinary differential equation (ODE) models, where studying the effect of an individual's contact network is challenging. They also do not consider all the interactions between individuals that can lead to changes in smoking behaviour, implying that they do not consider valuable information on the spread of smoking behaviour. In this context, we develop an agent-based model (ABM), calibrate and then validate it on historical trends observed in the US and UK. Our ABM considers spontaneous terms, interactions between agents, and the agent's contact network. To explore the effect of the underlying network on smoking dynamics, we test the ABM on six different networks, both synthetic and real-world. In addition, we also compare the ABM with an ODE model. Our results suggest that the dynamics from the ODE model are similar to the ABM only when the network structure is fully connected (FC). The FC network performs poorly in replicating the empirical trends in the data, while the real-world network best replicates it amongst the six networks. Further, when information on the real-world network is unavailable, our ABM on Lancichinetti-Fortunato-Radicchi benchmark networks (or networks with a similar average degree as the real-world network) can be used to model smoking behaviour. These results suggest that networks are essential for modelling smoking behaviour and that our ABM can be used to develop network-based intervention strategies and policies for tobacco control.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.