Paper detail

Improving the performance of reputation evaluating by combining the structure of network and nonlinear recovery

Characterizing the reputation of an evaluator is particularly significant for consumer to obtain useful information from online rating systems. Furthermore, to overcome the difficulties with spam attacks on the rating system and to get the reliable on reputation of evaluators is an important topic in the research. We have noticed that most of the existing evaluator reputation evaluation methods only rely on the evaluator's rating information and abnormal behavior to establish a reputation system, which miss the systematic aspects of the rating systems including the structure of the evaluator-object bipartite network and the effects of nonlinear effects. This study we propose an improved reputation evaluation method by combining the structure of the evaluator-object bipartite network with rating information and introducing penalty and reward factors. This novel method has been empirically analyzed on a large-scale artificial data set and two real data sets. The results show that the proposed method is more accurate and robust in the presence of spam attacks. This fresh idea contributes a new way for building reputation evaluation models in sparse bipartite rating network.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.