Paper detail

Improving the Performance and Resilience of MPI Parallel Jobs with Topology and Fault-Aware Process Placement

HPC systems keep growing in size to meet the ever-increasing demand for performance and computational resources. Apart from increased performance, large scale systems face two challenges that hinder further growth: energy efficiency and resiliency. At the same time, applications seeking increased performance rely on advanced parallelism for exploiting system resources, which leads to increased pressure on system interconnects. At large system scales, increased communication locality can be beneficial both in terms of application performance and energy consumption. Towards this direction, several studies focus on deriving a mapping of an application's processes to system nodes in a way that communication cost is reduced. A common approach is to express both the application's communication patterns and the system architecture as graphs and then solve the corresponding mapping problem. Apart from communication cost, the completion time of a job can also be affected by node failures. Node failures may result in job abortions, requiring job restarts. In this paper, we address the problem of assigning processes to system resources with the goal of reducing communication cost while also taking into account node failures. The proposed approach is integrated into the Slurm resource manager. Evaluation results show that, in scenarios where few nodes have a low outage probability, the proposed process placement approach achieves a notable decrease in the completion time of batches of MPI jobs. Compared to the default process placement approach in Slurm, the reduction is 18.9% and 31%, respectively for two different MPI applications.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.