Paper detail

Improving the Efficiency of Variationally Enhanced Sampling with Wavelet-Based Bias Potentials

Collective variable-based enhanced sampling methods are routinely used on systems with metastable states, where high free energy barriers impede proper sampling of the free energy landscapes when using conventional molecular dynamics simulations. One such method is variationally enhanced sampling (VES), which is based on a variational principle where a bias potential in the space of some chosen slow degrees of freedom, or collective variables, is constructed by minimizing a convex functional. In practice, the bias potential is taken as a linear expansion in some basis function set. So far, primarily basis functions delocalized in the collective variable space, like plane waves, Chebyshev, or Legendre polynomials, have been used. However, there has not been an extensive study of how the convergence behavior is affected by the choice of the basis functions. In particular, it remains an open question if localized basis functions might perform better. In this work, we implement, tune, and validate Daubechies wavelets as basis functions for VES\@. The wavelets construct orthogonal and localized bases that exhibit an attractive multiresolution property. We evaluate the performance of wavelet and other basis functions on various systems, going from model potentials to the calcium carbonate association process in water. We observe that wavelets exhibit excellent performance and much more robust convergence behavior than all other basis functions, as well as better performance than metadynamics. In particular, using wavelet bases yields far smaller fluctuations of the bias potential within individual runs and smaller differences between independent runs. Based on our overall results, we can recommend wavelets as basis functions for VES.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.