Paper detail

Improving the Diagnosis of Psychiatric Disorders with Self-Supervised Graph State Space Models

Single subject prediction of brain disorders from neuroimaging data has gained increasing attention in recent years. Yet, for some heterogeneous disorders such as major depression disorder (MDD) and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), the performance of prediction models on large-scale multi-site datasets remains poor. We present a two-stage framework to improve the diagnosis of heterogeneous psychiatric disorders from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI). First, we propose a self-supervised mask prediction task on data from healthy individuals that can exploit differences between healthy controls and patients in clinical datasets. Next, we train a supervised classifier on the learned discriminative representations. To model rs-fMRI data, we develop Graph-S4; an extension to the recently proposed state-space model S4 to graph settings where the underlying graph structure is not known in advance. We show that combining the framework and Graph-S4 can significantly improve the diagnostic performance of neuroimaging-based single subject prediction models of MDD and ASD on three open-source multi-center rs-fMRI clinical datasets.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.