Paper detail

Improving Proton Dose Calculation Accuracy by Using Deep Learning

Accurate dose calculation is vitally important for proton therapy. Pencil beam (PB) model-based dose calculation is fast but inaccurate due to the approximation when dealing with inhomogeneities. Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation is the most accurate method, but it is time consuming. We hypothesize that deep learning methods can boost the accuracy of PB dose calculation to the level of MC. In this work, we developed a deep learning model that converts PB to MC doses for different tumor sites. The proposed model is based on our newly developed hierarchically densely connected U-Net (HD U-Net) network, and it uses the PB dose and patient CT image as inputs to generate the MC dose. We used 290 patients (90 with head and neck, 93 with liver, 75 with prostate, and 32 with lung cancer) to train, validate, and test the model. For each tumor site, we performed four numerical experiments to explore various combinations of training datasets. Training the model on data from all tumor sites together and using the dose distribution of each individual beam as input yielded the best performance for all four tumor sites. The average gamma index (1mm/1% criteria) between the converted dose and the MC dose was 92.8%, 92.7%, 89.7% and 99.6% for head and neck, liver, lung, and prostate test patients, respectively. The average time for dose conversion for a single field was less than 4 seconds. In conclusion, our deep learning-based approach can quickly boost the accuracy of proton PB dose distributions to that of MC dose distributions. The trained model can be readily adapted to new datasets for different tumor sites and from different hospitals through transfer learning. This model can be added as a plug-in to the clinical workflow of proton therapy treatment planning to improve the accuracy of proton dose calculation.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.