BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Yixun Xing

Yixun Xing contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.med-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning

In radiotherapy, a trade-off exists between computational workload/speed and dose calculation accuracy. Calculation methods like pencil-beam convolution can be much faster than Monte-Carlo methods, but less accurate. The dose difference, mostly caused by inhomogeneities and electronic disequilibrium, is highly correlated with the dose distribution and the underlying anatomical tissue density. We hypothesize that a conversion scheme can be established to boost low-accuracy doses to high-accuracy, using intensity information obtained from computed tomography (CT) images. A deep learning-driven framework was developed to test the hypothesis by converting between two commercially-available dose calculation methods: AAA (anisotropic-analytic-algorithm) and AXB (Acuros XB).A hierarchically-dense U-Net model was developed to boost the accuracy of AAA dose towards the AXB level. The network contained multiple layers of varying feature sizes to learn their dose differences, in relationship to CT, both locally and globally. AAA and AXB doses were calculated in pairs for 120 lung radiotherapy plans covering various treatment techniques, beam energies, tumor locations, and dose levels.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Improving Proton Dose Calculation Accuracy by Using Deep Learning

Accurate dose calculation is vitally important for proton therapy. Pencil beam (PB) model-based dose calculation is fast but inaccurate due to the approximation when dealing with inhomogeneities. Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation is the most accurate method, but it is time consuming. We hypothesize that deep learning methods can boost the accuracy of PB dose calculation to the level of MC. In this work, we developed a deep learning model that converts PB to MC doses for different tumor sites. The proposed model is based on our newly developed hierarchically densely connected U-Net (HD U-Net) network, and it uses the PB dose and patient CT image as inputs to generate the MC dose. We used 290 patients (90 with head and neck, 93 with liver, 75 with prostate, and 32 with lung cancer) to train, validate, and test the model. For each tumor site, we performed four numerical experiments to explore various combinations of training datasets. Training the model on data from all tumor sites together and using the dose distribution of each individual beam as input yielded the best performance for all four tumor sites. The average gamma index (1mm/1% criteria) between the converted dose and the MC dose was 92.8%, 92.7%, 89.7% and 99.6% for head and neck, liver, lung, and prostate test patients, respectively. The average time for dose conversion for a single field was less than 4 seconds. In conclusion, our deep learning-based approach can quickly boost the accuracy of proton PB dose distributions to that of MC dose distributions. The trained model can be readily adapted to new datasets for different tumor sites and from different hospitals through transfer learning. This model can be added as a plug-in to the clinical workflow of proton therapy treatment planning to improve the accuracy of proton dose calculation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

A Feasibility Study on Deep Learning-Based Radiotherapy Dose Calculation

Purpose: Various dose calculation algorithms are available for radiation therapy for cancer patients. However, these algorithms are faced with the tradeoff between efficiency and accuracy. The fast algorithms are generally less accurate, while the accurate dose engines are often time consuming. In this work, we try to resolve this dilemma by exploring deep learning (DL) for dose calculation. Methods: We developed a new radiotherapy dose calculation engine based on a modified Hierarchically Densely Connected U-net (HD U-net) model and tested its feasibility with prostate intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) cases. Mapping from an IMRT fluence map domain to a 3D dose domain requires a deep neural network of complicated architecture and a huge training dataset. To solve this problem, we first project the fluence maps to the dose domain using a modified ray-tracing algorithm, and then we use the HD U-net to map the ray-tracing dose distribution into an accurate dose distribution calculated using a collapsed cone convolution/superposition (CS) algorithm. Results: It takes about one second to compute a 3D dose distribution for a typical 7-field prostate IMRT plan, which can be further reduced to achieve real-time dose calculation by optimizing the network. For all eight testing patients, evaluation with Gamma Index and various clinical goals for IMRT optimization shows that the DL dose distributions are clinically identical to the CS dose distributions. Conclusions: We have shown the feasibility of using DL for calculating radiotherapy dose distribution with high accuracy and efficiency.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access