Paper detail

Improving Prediction-Based Lossy Compression Dramatically via Ratio-Quality Modeling

Error-bounded lossy compression is one of the most effective techniques for scientific data reduction. However, the traditional trial-and-error approach used to configure lossy compressors for finding the optimal trade-off between reconstructed data quality and compression ratio is prohibitively expensive. To resolve this issue, we develop a general-purpose analytical ratio-quality model based on the prediction-based lossy compression framework, which can effectively foresee the reduced data quality and compression ratio, as well as the impact of the lossy compressed data on post-hoc analysis quality. Our analytical model significantly improves the prediction-based lossy compression in three use-cases: (1) optimization of predictor by selecting the best-fit predictor; (2) memory compression with a target ratio; and (3) in-situ compression optimization by fine-grained error-bound tuning of various data partitions. We evaluate our analytical model on 10 scientific datasets, demonstrating its high accuracy (93.47% accuracy on average) and low computational cost (up to 18.7X lower than the trial-and-error approach) for estimating the compression ratio and the impact of lossy compression on post-hoc analysis quality. We also verified the high efficiency of our ratio-quality model using different applications across the three use-cases. In addition, the experiment demonstrates that our modeling based approach reduces the time to store the 3D Reverse Time Migration data by up to 3.4X over the traditional solution using 128 CPU cores from 8 compute nodes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.