Paper detail

Improving Monte Carlo randomized approximation schemes

Consider a central problem in randomized approximation schemes that use a Monte Carlo approach. Given a sequence of independent, identically distributed random variables $X_1,X_2,\ldots$ with mean $μ$ and standard deviation at most $c μ$, where $c$ is a known constant, and $ε,δ> 0$, create an estimate $\hat μ$ for $μ$ such that $\text{P}(|\hat μ- μ| > εμ) \leq δ$. This technique has been used for building randomized approximation schemes for the volume of a convex body, the permanent of a nonnegative matrix, the number of linear extensions of a poset, the partition function of the Ising model and many other problems. Existing methods use (to the leading order) $19.35 (c/ε)^2 \ln(δ^{-1})$ samples. This is the best possible number up to the constant factor, and it is an open question as to what is the best constant possible. This work gives an easy to apply estimate that only uses $6.96 (c/ε)^2 \ln(δ^{-1})$ samples in the leading order.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.