Paper detail

Improving heritability estimation by a variable selection approach in sparse high dimensional linear mixed models

Motivated by applications in neuroanatomy, we propose a novel methodology for estimating the heritability which corresponds to the proportion of phenotypic variance which can be explained by genetic factors. Estimating this quantity for neuroanatomical features is a fundamental challenge in psychiatric disease research. Since the phenotypic variations may only be due to a small fraction of the available genetic information, we propose an estimator of the heritability that can be used in high dimensional sparse linear mixed models. Our method consists of three steps. Firstly, a variable selection stage is performed in order to recover the support of the genetic effects -- also called causal variants -- that is to find the genetic effects which really explain the phenotypic variations. Secondly, we propose a maximum likelihood strategy for estimating the heritability which only takes into account the causal genetic effects found in the first step. Thirdly, we compute the standard error and the 95% confidence interval associated to our heritability estimator thanks to a nonparametric bootsrap approach. Our main contribution consists in providing an estimation of the heritability with standard errors substantially smaller than methods without variable selection when the genetic effects are very sparse. Since the real genetic architecture is in general unknown in practice, we also propose an empirical criterion which allows the user to decide whether it is relevant to apply a variable selection based approach or not. We illustrate the performance of our methodology on synthetic and real neuroanatomic data coming from the Imagen project. We also show that our approach has a very low computational burden and is very efficient from a statistical point of view.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.