Paper detail

Improving estimates of the growth rate using galaxy-velocity correlations: a simulation study

We present an improved framework for estimating the growth rate of large-scale structure, using measurements of the galaxy-velocity cross-correlation in configuration space. We consider standard estimators of the velocity auto-correlation function, $ψ_1$ and $ψ_2$, the two-point galaxy correlation function, $ξ_{gg}$, and introduce a new estimator of the galaxy-velocity cross-correlation function, $ψ_3$. By including pair counts measured from random catalogues of velocities and positions sampled from distributions characteristic of the true data, we find that the variance in the galaxy-velocity cross-correlation function is significantly reduced. Applying a covariance analysis and $χ^2$ minimisation procedure to these statistics, we determine estimates and errors for the normalised growth rate $fσ_8$ and the parameter $β= f/b$, where $b$ is the galaxy bias factor. We test this framework on mock hemisphere datasets for redshift $z < 0.1$ with realistic velocity noise constructed from the L-PICOLA simulation code, and find that we are able to recover the fiducial value of $fσ_8$ from the joint combination of $ψ_1$ + $ψ_2$ + $ψ_3$ + $ξ_{gg}$, with 15\% accuracy from individual mocks. We also recover the fiducial $fσ_8$ to within 1$σ$ regardless of the combination of correlation statistics used. When we consider all four statistics together we find that the statistical uncertainty in our measurement of the growth rate is reduced by $59\%$ compared to the same analysis only considering $ψ_2$, by $53\%$ compared to the same analysis only considering $ψ_1$, and by $52\%$ compared to the same analysis jointly considering $ψ_1$ and $ψ_2$.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.