BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Rossana Ruggeri

Rossana Ruggeri contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Testing modified gravity scenarios with direct peculiar velocities

The theoretical basis of dark energy remains unknown and could signify a need to modify the laws of gravity on cosmological scales. In this study we investigate how the clustering and motions of galaxies can be used as probes of modified gravity theories, using galaxy and direct peculiar velocity auto- and cross-correlation functions. We measure and fit these correlation functions in simulations of $Λ$CDM, DGP, and $f(R)$ cosmologies and, by extracting the characteristic parameters of each model, we show that these theories can be distinguished from General Relativity using these measurements. We present forecasts showing that with sufficiently large data samples, this analysis technique is a competitive probe that can help place limits on allowed deviations from GR. For example, a peculiar velocity survey reaching to $z=0.5$ with $20\%$ distance accuracy would constrain model parameters to 3-$σ$ confidence limits $\log_{10}|f_{R0}| < -6.45$ for $f(R)$ gravity and $r_c > 2.88 \, c/H_0$ for nDGP, assuming a fiducial GR model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Improving estimates of the growth rate using galaxy-velocity correlations: a simulation study

We present an improved framework for estimating the growth rate of large-scale structure, using measurements of the galaxy-velocity cross-correlation in configuration space. We consider standard estimators of the velocity auto-correlation function, $ψ_1$ and $ψ_2$, the two-point galaxy correlation function, $ξ_{gg}$, and introduce a new estimator of the galaxy-velocity cross-correlation function, $ψ_3$. By including pair counts measured from random catalogues of velocities and positions sampled from distributions characteristic of the true data, we find that the variance in the galaxy-velocity cross-correlation function is significantly reduced. Applying a covariance analysis and $χ^2$ minimisation procedure to these statistics, we determine estimates and errors for the normalised growth rate $fσ_8$ and the parameter $β= f/b$, where $b$ is the galaxy bias factor. We test this framework on mock hemisphere datasets for redshift $z < 0.1$ with realistic velocity noise constructed from the L-PICOLA simulation code, and find that we are able to recover the fiducial value of $fσ_8$ from the joint combination of $ψ_1$ + $ψ_2$ + $ψ_3$ + $ξ_{gg}$, with 15\% accuracy from individual mocks. We also recover the fiducial $fσ_8$ to within 1$σ$ regardless of the combination of correlation statistics used. When we consider all four statistics together we find that the statistical uncertainty in our measurement of the growth rate is reduced by $59\%$ compared to the same analysis only considering $ψ_2$, by $53\%$ compared to the same analysis only considering $ψ_1$, and by $52\%$ compared to the same analysis jointly considering $ψ_1$ and $ψ_2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Compressing combined probes: redshift weights for joint lensing and clustering analyses

Combining different observational probes, such as galaxy clustering and weak lensing, is a promising technique for unveiling the physics of the Universe with upcoming dark energy experiments. Whilst this strategy significantly improves parameter constraints, decreasing the degeneracies of individual analyses and controlling the systematics, processing data from tens of millions of galaxies is not a trivial task. In this work we derive and test a new estimator for joint clustering and lensing data analysis, maximising the scientific return and decreasing the computational cost. Our estimator compresses the data by up-weighting the components most sensitive to the parameters of interest, with no loss of information, taking into account information from the cross-correlation between the two probes. We derive optimal redshift weights which may be applied to individual galaxies when testing a given statistic and cosmological model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

How accurately can we measure the baryon acoustic oscillation feature?

Baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) represent one of the cleanest probes of dark energy, allowing for tests of the cosmological model through the measurement of distance and expansion rate from a 3D galaxy distribution. The signal appears at large scales in the correlation function where linear theory applies, allowing for the construction of accurate models. However, due to the lower number of modes available at these scales, sample variance has a significant impact on the signal, and may sharpen or widen the underlying peak. Therefore, equivalent mock realizations of a galaxy survey present different errors in the position of the peak when uncertainties are estimated from the posterior probability distribution corresponding to the individual mocks. Hence the posterior width, often quoted as the error in BAO survey measurements, is subject to sample noise. A different definition of the error is provided by the asymptotic variance of the maximum likelihood estimator, which involves the average over multiple realizations, and is not subject to sample noise. In this work we re-analyse the main galaxy survey data available for BAO measurements and quantify the impact of the noise component on the error quoted for BAO measurements. We quantify the difference between three definitions of the error: the confidence region computed from a single posterior, the average of the variances of many realizations, and the Fisher matrix prediction assuming a Gaussian likelihood.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access