Paper detail

Improving dynamical properties of metropolized discretizations of overdamped Langevin dynamics

The discretization of overdamped Langevin dynamics, through schemes such as the Euler-Maruyama method, can be corrected by some acceptance/rejection rule, based on a Metropolis-Hastings criterion for instance. In this case, the invariant measure sampled by the Markov chain is exactly the Boltzmann-Gibbs measure. However, rejections perturb the dynamical consistency of the resulting numerical method with the reference dynamics. We present in this work some modifications of the standard correction of discretizations of overdamped Langevin dynamics on compact spaces by a Metropolis-Hastings procedure, which allow us to either improve the strong order of the numerical method, or to decrease the bias in the estimation of transport coefficients characterizing the effective dynamical behavior of the dynamics. For the latter approach, we rely on modified numerical schemes together with a Barker rule for the acceptance/rejection criterion.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.