Paper detail

Improving Disease Classification Performance and Explainability of Deep Learning Models in Radiology with Heatmap Generators

As deep learning is widely used in the radiology field, the explainability of such models is increasingly becoming essential to gain clinicians' trust when using the models for diagnosis. In this research, three experiment sets were conducted with a U-Net architecture to improve the classification performance while enhancing the heatmaps corresponding to the model's focus through incorporating heatmap generators during training. All of the experiments used the dataset that contained chest radiographs, associated labels from one of the three conditions ("normal", "congestive heart failure (CHF)", and "pneumonia"), and numerical information regarding a radiologist's eye-gaze coordinates on the images. The paper (A. Karargyris and Moradi, 2021) that introduced this dataset developed a U-Net model, which was treated as the baseline model for this research, to show how the eye-gaze data can be used in multi-modal training for explainability improvement. To compare the classification performances, the 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were measured. The best method achieved an AUC of 0.913 (CI: 0.860-0.966). The greatest improvements were for the "pneumonia" and "CHF" classes, which the baseline model struggled most to classify, resulting in AUCs of 0.859 (CI: 0.732-0.957) and 0.962 (CI: 0.933-0.989), respectively. The proposed method's decoder was also able to produce probability masks that highlight the determining image parts in model classifications, similarly as the radiologist's eye-gaze data. Hence, this work showed that incorporating heatmap generators and eye-gaze information into training can simultaneously improve disease classification and provide explainable visuals that align well with how the radiologist viewed the chest radiographs when making diagnosis.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.