Paper detail

Improving Dependability of Neuromorphic Computing With Non-Volatile Memory

As process technology continues to scale aggressively, circuit aging in a neuromorphic hardware due to negative bias temperature instability (NBTI) and time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) is becoming a critical reliability issue and is expected to proliferate when using non-volatile memory (NVM) for synaptic storage. This is because an NVM requires high voltage and current to access its synaptic weight, which further accelerates the circuit aging in a neuromorphic hardware. Current methods for qualifying reliability are overly conservative, since they estimate circuit aging considering worst-case operating conditions and unnecessarily constrain performance. This paper proposes RENEU, a reliability-oriented approach to map machine learning applications to neuromorphic hardware, with the aim of improving system-wide reliability without compromising key performance metrics such as execution time of these applications on the hardware. Fundamental to RENEU is a novel formulation of the aging of CMOS-based circuits in a neuromorphic hardware considering different failure mechanisms. Using this formulation, RENEU develops a system-wide reliability model which can be used inside a design-space exploration framework involving the mapping of neurons and synapses to the hardware. To this end, RENEU uses an instance of Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to generate mappings that are Pareto-optimal in terms of performance and reliability. We evaluate RENEU using different machine learning applications on a state-of-the-art neuromorphic hardware with NVM synapses. Our results demonstrate an average 38\% reduction in circuit aging, leading to an average 18% improvement in the lifetime of the hardware compared to current practices. RENEU only introduces a marginal performance overhead of 5% compared to a performance-oriented state-of-the-art.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.