Paper detail

Improving bounds for singular operators via Sharp Reverse Hölder Inequality for $A_{\infty}$

In this expository article we collect and discuss some recent results on different consequences of a Sharp Reverse Hölder Inequality for $A_{\infty}$ weights. For two given operators $T$ and $S$, we study $L^p(w)$ bounds of Coifman-Fefferman type. $ \|Tf\|_{L^p(w)}\le c_{n,w,p} \|Sf\|_{L^p(w)}, $ that can be understood as a way to control $T$ by $S$. We will focus on a \emph{quantitative} analysis of the constants involved and show that we can improve classical results regarding the dependence on the weight $w$ in terms of Wilson's $A_{\infty}$ constant $ [w]_{A_{\infty}}:=\sup_Q\frac{1}{w(Q)}\int_Q M(wχ_Q).$ We will also exhibit recent improvements on the problem of finding sharp constants for weighted norm inequalities involving several singular operators. We obtain mixed $A_{1}$--$A_{\infty}$ estimates for the commutator $[b,T]$ and for its higher order analogue $T^k_{b}$. A common ingredient in the proofs presented here is a recent improvement of the Reverse Hölder Inequality for $A_{\infty}$ weights involving Wilson's constant.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.