Paper detail

Improving Biomarker Based HIV Incidence Estimation in the Treatment Era

Estimating HIV-1 incidence using biomarker assays in cross-sectional surveys is important for understanding the HIV pandemic. However, the utility of these estimates has been limited by uncertainty about what input parameters to use for False Recency Rate (FRR) and Mean Duration of Recent Infection (MDRI) after applying recent infection testing algorithm (RITA). This article shows how testing and diagnosis in a population reduce both FRR and MDRI compared to a treatment-naive population. Using self-reported testing history, a new method is proposed for calculating appropriate context-specific estimates of FRR and MDRI. The result of this is a new formula for incidence that depends only on reference FRR and MDRI parameters derived in an undiagnosed, treatment-naive, non-elite controller, non-AIDS-progressed population.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.