Paper detail

Improved Upper Bounds on the Asymptotic Growth Velocity of Eden Clusters

We consider the asymptotic shape of clusters in the Eden model on a d-dimensional hypercubical lattice. We discuss two improvements for the well-known upper bound to the growth velocity in different directions by that of the independent branching process (IBP). In the IBP, each cell gives rise to a daughter cell at a neighboring site at a constant rate. In the first improvement, we do not allow such births along the bond connecting the cell to its mother cell. In the second, we iteratively evolve the system by a growth as IBP for a duration $Δ$ t, followed by culling process in which if any cell produced a descendant within this interval, who occupies the same site as the cell itself, then the descendant is removed. We study the improvement on the upper bound on the velocity for different dimensions d. The bounds are asymptotically exact in the large-d limit. But in $d =2$, the improvement over the IBP approximation is only a few percent.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.