Paper detail

Improved topological conformity enhances heat conduction across metal contacts on transferred graphene

Thermal conductance of metal contacts on transferred graphene (trG) could be significantly reduced from the intrinsic value of similar contacts on as-grown graphene (grG), due to additional resistance by increased roughness, residues, oxides and voids. In this paper, we compare the thermal conductance (G) of Al/trG/Cu interfaces with that of Al/grG/Cu interfaces to understand heat transfer across metal contacts on transferred graphene. Our samples are polycrystalline graphene grown on Cu foils by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and CVD-grown graphene transferred to evaporated Cu thin films. We find that for the Al/grG/Cu interfaces of as-grown CVD graphene, G=31 MW m^{-2} K^{-1} at room temperature, two orders of magnitude lower than that of Al/Cu interfaces. For most as-transferred graphene on Cu films, G=20 MW m^{-2} K^{-1}, 35% lower than that of as-grown CVD graphene. We carefully rule out the contributions of residues, native oxides and interfaces roughness, and attribute the difference in the thermal conductance of as-grown and as-transferred CVD graphene to different degrees of conformity of graphene to the Cu substrates. We find that a contact area of 50% only reduces the thermal conductance by 35%, suggesting that a small amount of heat transfer occurs across voids at graphene interfaces. We successfully improve the conformity of the as-transferred graphene to the substrates by annealing the samples at 300°C, and thus enhance the thermal conductance of the transferred graphene to the intrinsic value. From the temperature dependence measurements of G of Al/trG/Cu and Al/grG/Cu interfaces, we also confirm that phonons are the dominant heat carries across the metal/graphene/metal interfaces despite a substantial carrier concentration of 3x10^{12} cm^{-2} induced in the graphene.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.