Paper detail

Improved Thermometer from Intermediate Mass Fragments in Heavy-Ion Collisions with Isobaric Yield Ratio Difference

\item[Background] Temperature is an important parameter in studying many important questions in heavy-ion collisions. A thermometer based on the isobaric yield ratio (IYR) has been proposed [Ma \textit{et al.}, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{86}, 054611 (2012) and Ma \textit{et al.}, \textit{ibid.}, Phys. Rev. C \textbf{88}, 014609 (2013)]. \item[Purpose] An improved thermometer ($T_{IB}$) is proposed based on the difference between IYRs. $T_{IB}$ obtained from isobars in different reactions will be compared. \item[Methods] The yields of three isobars are employed in $T_{IB}$. The residual free energy of the three isobars are replaced by that of the binding energy. No secondary decay modification for odd $A$ fragment is used in $T_{IB}$. \item[Results] The measured fragment yields in the 140$A$ MeV $^{40, 48}$Ca + $^{9}$Be ($^{181}$Ta) and $^{58, 64}$Ni + $^9$Be ($^{181}$Ta), the 1$A$ GeV $^{124, 136}$Xe + Pb, and the $^{112,124}$Sn + $^{112,124}$Sn reactions have been analyzed to obtain $T_{IB}$ from IMFs. $T_{IB}$ from most of the fragments in the $^{40, 48}$Ca and $^{58, 64}$Ni reactions is in the range of 0.6 MeV $ < T_{IB} < $ 3.5 MeV. $T_{IB}$ from most of the fragments in the $^{124}$Xe and $^{112,124}$Sn reactions is in the range of 0.5 MeV $ < T_{IB} < $ 2.5 MeV, while the range is 0.5 MeV $ < T_{IB} <$ 4 MeV from most of the fragments in the $^{136}$Xe reaction. In general, for most of the fragments $T_{IB}$ in the $^{40, 48}$Ca and $^{58, 64}$Ni reactions are very similar (except in the very neutron-rich fragments), and $T_{IB}$ from IMFs in the $^{124, 136}$Xe and $^{112,124}$Sn reactions is also similar. A slightly dependence of $T_{IB}$ on $A$ is found. \item[Conclusions] Using the binding energy of the nucleus, $T_{IB}$ can be obtained without the knowledge of the free energies of fragments. In the investigated reactions, $T_{IB}$ from most of the IMFs is low.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.