Paper detail

Improved-Sensitivity Integral SQUID Magnetometry of (Ga,Mn)N Thin Films in Proximity to Mg-doped GaN

Nominally 45 nm GaN:Mg/ 5 nm (Ga,Mn)N / 45 nm GaN:Mg trilayers structures prepared by molecular beam epitaxy on GaN-buffered Al2O3 substrates are investigated to verify whether the indirect co-doping by holes from the cladding layers can alter the spin-spin interaction in (Ga,Mn)N. The four investigated structures, differing with the Mg doping level, are carefully characterized at the nanoscale by HRTEM, EDX, and by SIMS. HRTEM decisively excluded a presence of foreign Mn-rich phases. The structures, up to medium Mg doping, show no Mg over-doping effects. Magnetic studies of these structures are aided by the employment of a dedicated experimental approach of the in situ compensation of the magnetic contribution from the substrate, allowing up to about fifty-fold reduction of this contribution. This technique, dedicated to these structures, simultaneously provides a tenfold reduction of temporal instabilities of the magnetometric unit and lowers the experimental jitter to merely $5 \times 10^{-7}$~emu at 70~kOe, vastly increasing the precision and the credibility of the results of the standard integral SQUID magnetometry in high magnetic fields. The magnetic characteristics of the trilayers structures established here prove identical with the already known properties of the thick (Ga,Mn)N single layers, namely (i) the low temperature ferromagnetism among Mn$^{3+}$ ions driven by superexchange and (ii) purely paramagnetic response at higher temperatures. The possible cause of the lack of any effects brought about by the adjacent Mg-doping is a presence of residual Mn in the cladding layers, resulting in the deactivation of the p-type doping intended there. This finding points out that a more intensive technological effort has to be exerted to promote the co-doping-driven carrier-mediated ferromagnetic coupling in Mn-enriched GaN, especially at elevated temperatures.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.