Paper detail

Improved performance guarantees for Tukey's median

Is there a natural way to order data in dimension greater than one? The approach based on the notion of data depth, often associated with John Tukey, is among the most popular. Tukey's depth has found applications in robust statistics, graph theory, and the study of elections and social choice. We present improved performance guarantees for empirical Tukey's median, a deepest point associated with a given sample, when the data-generating distribution is elliptically symmetric and possibly anisotropic. Some of our results remain valid in the wider class of affine equivariant estimators. As a corollary of our bounds, we show that the typical diameter of the set of all empirical Tukey's medians scales like $o(n^{-1/2})$ where $n$ is the sample size. Moreover, when the data follow the bivariate normal distribution, we prove that with high probability, the diameter is of order $O(n^{-3/4}\log^{1/2}(n))$. On the technical side, we show how affine equivariance can be leveraged to improve concentration bounds; moreover, we develop sharp strong approximation results for empirical processes indexed by halfspaces that could be of independent interest.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.