Paper detail

Improved parametrization of the growth index for dark energy and DGP models

We propose two improved parameterized form for the growth index of the linear matter perturbations: (I) $γ(z)=γ_0+(γ_{\infty}-γ_0){z\over z+1}$ and (II) $γ(z)=γ_0+γ_1 \frac{z}{z+1}+(γ_{\infty}-γ_1-γ_0)(\frac{z}{z+1})^α$. With these forms of $γ(z)$, we analyze the accuracy of the approximation the growth factor $f$ by $Ω^{γ(z)}_m$ for both the $ω$CDM model and the DGP model. For the first improved parameterized form, we find that the approximation accuracy is enhanced at the high redshifts for both kinds of models, but it is not at the low redshifts. For the second improved parameterized form, it is found that $Ω^{γ(z)}_m$ approximates the growth factor $f$ very well for all redshifts. For chosen $α$, the relative error is below 0.003% for the $Λ$CDM model and 0.028% for the DGP model when $Ω_{m}=0.27$. Thus, the second improved parameterized form of $γ(z)$ should be useful for the high precision constraint on the growth index of different models with the observational data. Moreover, we also show that $α$ depends on the equation of state $ω$ and the fractional energy density of matter $Ω_{m0}$, which may help us learn more information about dark energy and DGP models.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.