Paper detail

Improved microscopic nuclear level densities within the triaxial Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov plus combinatorial method

New developments have been brought to our energy-, spin- and parity-dependent nuclear level densities based on the microscopic combinatorial method. Our new calculation is based on the BSkG3 mean-field model which relies on a three-dimensional coordinate-space representation of the nucleus, allowing for the spontaneous breaking of ground state rotational, axial and reflection symmetry. In particular, we now account for the impact of possible triaxial deformation of nuclear ground states on the level density. This has two effects on our calculations: the additional freedom of the single-particle levels affects the intrinsic level density while the absence of a rotational symmetry axis results in a larger collective correction. The present model reproduces the experimental s- and p-wave neutron resonance spacings with a degree of accuracy comparable to that of the best global models available. It is also shown that the model gives a reliable extrapolation at low energies where experimental data on the cumulative number of levels can be extracted. The predictions are also in good agreement with the experimental data extracted from the Oslo method. Total level densities for more than 8500 nuclei are made available in a table format for practical applications. For the nuclei for which experimental s-wave spacings and enough low-lying states exist, renormalization factors are provided to reproduce simultaneously both observables. The same combinatorial method is used to estimate the nuclear level densities at the fission saddle points of actinides and at the shape isomer deformation. Finally, the new nuclear level densities are applied to the calculation of radiative neutron capture cross sections and compared with those obtained with our previous combinatorial model.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.