Paper detail

Improved determination of Heavy Quarkonium magnetic dipole transitions in pNRQCD

We compute the magnetic dipole transitions between low lying Heavy Quarkonium states in a model independent way. We use the weak-coupling version of the effective field theory named potential NRQCD with the static potential exactly incorporated in the leading order Hamiltonian. The precision we reach is $k_γ^3/m^2\times{\cal O}(α_s^2,v^2)$ and $k_γ^3/m^2\times{\cal O}(v^4)$ for the allowed and forbidden transitions respectively. We also resum the large logarithms associated to the heavy quark mass scale. The specific transitions considered in this paper are the following: $Υ(1S) \to η_b(1S)\,γ$, $J/ψ(1S) \to η_c(1S)\,γ$, $h_b(1P) \to χ_{b0,1}(1P)\,γ$, $χ_{b2}(1P) \to h_b(1P)\,γ$, $Υ(2S) \to η_b(2S)\,γ$, $Υ(2S) \to η_b(1S)\,γ$ and $η_b(2S)\toΥ(1S)\,γ$. The effect of the new power counting is found to be large and the exact treatment of the soft logarithms of the static potential makes the factorization scale dependence much smaller. The convergence for the $b\bar b$ ground state is quite good, and also quite reasonable for the $c\bar c$ ground state and the $b\bar b$ 1P state. For all of them we give solid predictions. For the 2S decays the situation is less conclusive, yet our results are perfectly consistent with existing data, as the previous disagreement with experiment for the $Υ(2S) \to η_b(1S)\,γ$ decay fades away. We also profit to compute some expectation values like the electromagnetic radius, r^2, or p^2. We find r^2 to be nicely convergent in all cases, whereas the convergence of p^2 is typically worse.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.