Paper detail

Improved and Generalized Upper Bounds on the Complexity of Policy Iteration

Given a Markov Decision Process (MDP) with $n$ states and a totalnumber $m$ of actions, we study the number of iterations needed byPolicy Iteration (PI) algorithms to converge to the optimal$γ$-discounted policy. We consider two variations of PI: Howard'sPI that changes the actions in all states with a positive advantage,and Simplex-PI that only changes the action in the state with maximaladvantage. We show that Howard's PI terminates after at most $O\left(\frac{m}{1-γ}\log\left(\frac{1}{1-γ}\right)\right)$iterations, improving by a factor $O(\log n)$ a result by Hansen etal., while Simplex-PI terminates after at most $O\left(\frac{nm}{1-γ}\log\left(\frac{1}{1-γ}\right)\right)$iterations, improving by a factor $O(\log n)$ a result by Ye. Undersome structural properties of the MDP, we then consider bounds thatare independent of the discount factor~$γ$: quantities ofinterest are bounds $τ\_t$ and $τ\_r$---uniform on all states andpolicies---respectively on the \emph{expected time spent in transientstates} and \emph{the inverse of the frequency of visits in recurrentstates} given that the process starts from the uniform distribution.Indeed, we show that Simplex-PI terminates after at most $\tilde O\left(n^3 m^2 τ\_t τ\_r \right)$ iterations. This extends arecent result for deterministic MDPs by Post & Ye, in which $τ\_t\le 1$ and $τ\_r \le n$, in particular it shows that Simplex-PI isstrongly polynomial for a much larger class of MDPs. We explain whysimilar results seem hard to derive for Howard's PI. Finally, underthe additional (restrictive) assumption that the state space ispartitioned in two sets, respectively states that are transient andrecurrent for all policies, we show that both Howard's PI andSimplex-PI terminate after at most $\tilde O(m(n^2τ\_t+nτ\_r))$iterations.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.