Paper detail

Improved $^{192,194,195,196}$Pt($n,γ$) and $^{192}$Ir($n,γ$) astrophysical reactions rates

$^{192}$Pt is produced solely by the slow neutron capture (\textit{s}) nucleosynthesis process and hence an accurate ($n$,$γ$) reaction rate for this nuclide would allow its use as an important calibration point near the termination of the \textit{s}-process nucleosynthesis flow. For this reason, we have measured neutron capture and total cross sections for $% ^{192,194,195,196,nat}$Pt in the energy range from 10 eV to several hundred keV at the Oak Ridge Electron Linear Accelerator. Measurements on the other Pt isotopes were, in part, necessitated by the fact that only a relatively small $^{192}$Pt sample of modest enrichment was available. Astrophysical $% ^{192,194,195,196}$Pt($n,γ$) reaction rates, accurate to approximately 3%--5 %, were calculated from these data. No accurate reaction rates have been published previously for any of these isotopes. At \textit{s}-process temperatures, previously recommended rates are larger (by as much as 35%) and have significantly different shapes as functions of temperature, than our new rates. We used our new Pt results, together with $^{191,193}$Ir(n,$% γ$) data, to calibrate nuclear statistical model calculations and hence obtain an improved rate for the unmeasured \textit{s}-process branching-point isotope $^{192}$Ir.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.