Paper detail

Implicit Diversity in Image Summarization

Studies have shown that the people depicted in image search results tend to be of majority groups with respect to socially salient attributes. This skew goes beyond that which already exists in the world - e.g., Kay et al. showed that although 28% of CEOs in US are women, only 10% of the top 100 results for CEO in Google Image Search are women. Most existing approaches to correct for this kind of bias assume that the images of people include socially salient attribute labels. However, such labels are often unknown. Further, using automated techniques to infer these labels may often not be possible within acceptable accuracy ranges, and may not be desirable due to the additional biases this process could incur. We develop a novel approach that takes as input a visibly diverse control set of images and uses this set to select a set of images of people in response to a query. The goal is to have a resulting set that is more visibly diverse in a manner that emulates the diversity depicted in the control set. Importantly, this approach does not require images to be labelled at any point; effectively, it gives a way to implicitly diversify the set of images selected. We provide two variants of our approach: the first is a modification of the MMR algorithm to incorporate the diversity scores, and second is a more efficient variant that does not consider within-list redundancy. We evaluate these approaches empirically on two datasets 1) a new dataset containing top Google image results for 96 occupations, for which we evaluate gender and skin-tone diversity with respect to occupations and 2) the CelebA dataset for which we evaluate gender diversity with respect to facial features. Our approaches produce image sets that significantly improve the visible diversity of the results, compared to current Google search and other diverse image summarization algorithms, at a minimal cost to accuracy.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.