Implications of the CMS search for W_R on Grand Unification

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Abstract

The CMS experiment at the Large Hadron Collider has reported a 2.8σσ excess in the (2e)(2jets)(2e)(2jets) channel around 2.1 TeV. Interpretation of this data is reconsidered in terms of the production of a right-handed weak gauge boson, WRW_R, of the left-right symmetric model and in an SO(10)SO(10) grand unified theory abiding by the Extended Survival Hypothesis. The left-right symmetric model can be consistent with this excess if (a) the heavy right-handed neutrino has a mass near WRW_R, or (b) if gL≠gRg_L \neq g_R, or (c) the right-handed CKM matrix is nontrivial. Combinations of the above possibilities are also viable. A WRW_R with a mass in the TeV region if embedded in SO(10)SO(10) is not compatible with gL=gRg_L = g_R. Rather, it implies 0.64≤gR/gL≤0.780.64 \leq g_R/g_L \leq 0.78. Further, a unique symmetry-breaking route -- the order being left-right discrete symmetry breaking first, followed by SU(4)CSU(4)_C and finally SU(2)RSU(2)_R -- to the standard model is picked out. The L↔RL \leftrightarrow R discrete symmetry has to be broken at around 101610^{16} GeV. The grand unification scale is pushed to 101810^{18} GeV making the detection of proton decay in ongoing searches rather unlikely. The SU(4)CSU(4)_C breaking scale can be at its allowed lower limit of 10610^6 GeV so that n−nˉn - \bar{n} oscillation or flavour changing processes such as KL→μeK_L \rightarrow μe and Bd,s→μeB_{d,s} \rightarrow μe may be detectable. The Higgs scalar multiplets responsible for SO(10)SO(10) symmetry breaking at various stages are uniquely identified so long as one adheres to a minimalist principle. We also remark, {\em en passant}, about a partially unified Pati-Salam model.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.