Paper detail

Impact of Semiconductor Band Tails and Band Filling on Photovoltaic Efficiency Limits

The theoretical maximum efficiency of a solar cell is typically characterized by a detailed balance of optical absorption and emission for a semiconductor in the limit of unity radiative efficiency and an ideal step-function response for the density of states and absorbance at the semiconductor band edges, known as the Shockley-Queisser limit. However, real materials have non-abrupt band edges, which are typically characterized by an exponential distribution of states, known as an Urbach tail. We develop here a modified detailed balance limit of solar cells with imperfect band edges, using optoelectronic reciprocity relations. We find that for semiconductors whose band edges are broader than the thermal energy, kT, there is an effective renormalized bandgap given by the quasi-Fermi level splitting within the solar cell. This renormalized bandgap creates a Stokes shift between the onset of the absorption and photoluminescence emission energies, which significantly reduces the maximum achievable efficiency. The abruptness of the band edge density of states therefore has important implications for the maximum achievable photovoltaic efficiency.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.