Paper detail

Impact of event activity variable on the ratio of observables in isobar collisions

The STAR isobar data of $^{96}$Ru+$^{96}$Ru and $^{96}$Zr+$^{96}$Zr collisions at $\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}= 200$ GeV show that ratios of observables ($R_{\mathcal{O}}$) such as the multiplicity distribution, $p(N_{\mathrm{ch}})$, and the harmonic flow, $v_n$, deviate from unity, when presented as a function of centrality, $c$. These deviations have been attributed to the differences in the shape and radial profiles between $^{96}$Ru and $^{96}$Zr nuclei. In addition, the ratios $R_{\mathcal{O}}(x)$ depend on the choice of the event activity variable $x$, which could be either $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ or centrality. We estimate the difference $ΔR$ between these two choices, based on the published $p(N_{\mathrm{ch}})$, as well as those from a multiphase transport (AMPT) model with varied nuclear structure parameters: nuclear radius ($R_0$), surface diffuseness ($a_0$), quadrupole deformation ($β_2$), and octupole deformation ($β_3$). In contrary to $R_{v_n}(c)$, $R_{v_n}(N_{\mathrm{ch}})$ is nearly independent of the analysis approaches, suggesting that nonflow effects are better controlled by $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ than $c$. The ratios of observables sensitive to the chiral magnetic effect (CME) are also much closer to unity for $x=N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ than $x=c$, indicating that the ratios calculated at the same $N_{\mathrm{ch}}$ provide a better baseline for the non-CME background. According to the AMPT results, the dominant parameter for $ΔR$ is $a_0$, while $R_0$ and $β_n$ are only important in central collisions. The published $p(N_{\mathrm{ch}})$ is also used to estimate $ΔR_{\left\langle p_{\mathrm{T}}\right\rangle}$ for mean transverse momentum, which is non-negligible compared with $R_{\left\langle p_{\mathrm{T}}\right\rangle}-1$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.