Impact of event activity variable on the ratio of observables in isobar collisions

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Abstract

The STAR isobar data of 96^{96}Ru+96^{96}Ru and 96^{96}Zr+96^{96}Zr collisions at sNN=200\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}= 200 GeV show that ratios of observables (ROR_{\mathcal{O}}) such as the multiplicity distribution, p(Nch)p(N_{\mathrm{ch}}), and the harmonic flow, vnv_n, deviate from unity, when presented as a function of centrality, cc. These deviations have been attributed to the differences in the shape and radial profiles between 96^{96}Ru and 96^{96}Zr nuclei. In addition, the ratios RO(x)R_{\mathcal{O}}(x) depend on the choice of the event activity variable xx, which could be either NchN_{\mathrm{ch}} or centrality. We estimate the difference ΔRΔR between these two choices, based on the published p(Nch)p(N_{\mathrm{ch}}), as well as those from a multiphase transport (AMPT) model with varied nuclear structure parameters: nuclear radius (R0R_0), surface diffuseness (a0a_0), quadrupole deformation (β2β_2), and octupole deformation (β3β_3). In contrary to Rvn(c)R_{v_n}(c), Rvn(Nch)R_{v_n}(N_{\mathrm{ch}}) is nearly independent of the analysis approaches, suggesting that nonflow effects are better controlled by NchN_{\mathrm{ch}} than cc. The ratios of observables sensitive to the chiral magnetic effect (CME) are also much closer to unity for x=Nchx=N_{\mathrm{ch}} than x=cx=c, indicating that the ratios calculated at the same NchN_{\mathrm{ch}} provide a better baseline for the non-CME background. According to the AMPT results, the dominant parameter for ΔRΔR is a0a_0, while R0R_0 and βnβ_n are only important in central collisions. The published p(Nch)p(N_{\mathrm{ch}}) is also used to estimate ΔR⟨pT⟩ΔR_{\left\langle p_{\mathrm{T}}\right\rangle} for mean transverse momentum, which is non-negligible compared with R⟨pT⟩−1R_{\left\langle p_{\mathrm{T}}\right\rangle}-1.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.