Paper detail

Impact of Band Structure on Wave Function Dissipation in Field Emission Resonance

We demonstrated on Ag(111) and Ag(100) surfaces that the reciprocal of the field emission resonance (FER) linewidth, which is proportional to the mean lifetime of resonant electrons in FER, may vary with the electric field. The variation on Ag(111) was nearly smooth, whereas that on Ag(100) was sporadic and fluctuated remarkably. This drastic difference can be explained through their dissimilar projected bulk band structures and the ensemble interpretation of quantum mechanics, according to which all resonant electrons are governed by a single wave function. Ag(100) has an energy gap above its vacuum level, whereas Ag(111) does not. Consequently, the dissipation rate of the wave function, which is relevant to the FER linewidth, on Ag(111) was almost stable, whereas that on Ag(100) fluctuated. The fluctuation revealed that the quantum trapping effect and surface dipole layer on Ag(100) surface can be investigated through FER.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.