Paper detail

Impact of Atomic Parity Violation Measurements on Precision Electroweak Physics

The impact of atomic parity violation experiments on determination of the weak mixing parameter $\sin^2 θ$ and the Peskin-Takeuchi parameters $S$ and $T$ is reassessed in the light of recent electroweak measurements at LEP, SLAC, and Fermilab. Since the weak charge $Q_W$ provides unique information on $S$, its determination with a factor of four better accuracy than present levels can have a noticeable effect on global fits. However, the measurement of $ΔQ_W / Q_W$ for two different isotopes provides primarily information on $\sin^2 θ$. To specify this quantity to an accuracy of $\pm 0.0004$, comparable to that now provided by other electroweak experiments, one would have to determine $ΔQ_W/Q_W$ in cesium to about 0.1\% of its value, with comparable demands for other nuclei. The relative merits of absolute measurements of $Q_W$ and isotope ratios for discovering effects of new gauge bosons are noted briefly.

preprint1995arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.