Paper detail

Illustrating the structures of bias from immortal time using directed acyclic graphs

Background: Immortal time is a period of follow-up during which death or the study outcome cannot occur by design. Bias from immortal time has been increasingly recognized in epidemiologic studies. However, the fundamental causes and structures of bias from immortal time have not been explained systematically using a structural approach. Methods: We use an example "Do Nobel Prize winners live longer than less recognized scientists?" for illustration. We illustrate how immortal time arises and present the structures of bias from immortal time using time-varying directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). We further explore the structures of bias with the exclusion of immortal time and with the presence of competing risks. We discuss how these structures are shared by different study designs in pharmacoepidemiology and provide solutions, where possible, to address the bias. Results: We illustrate that immortal time arises from using postbaseline information to define exposure or eligibility. We use time-varying DAGs to explain the structures of bias from immortal time are confounding by survival until exposure allocation or selection bias from selecting on survival until eligibility. We explain that excluding immortal time from the follow-up does not fully address this confounding or selection bias, and that the presence of competing risks can worsen the bias. Bias from immortal time may be avoided by aligning time zero, exposure allocation and eligibility, and by excluding individuals with prior exposure. Conclusions: Understanding bias from immortal time in terms of confounding or selection bias helps researchers identify and thereby avoid or ameliorate this bias.

preprint2024arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.