Paper detail

$¶$ILCRO: Making Importance Landscapes Flat Again

Convolutional neural networks have had a great success in numerous tasks, including image classification, object detection, sequence modelling, and many more. It is generally assumed that such neural networks are translation invariant, meaning that they can detect a given feature independent of its location in the input image. While this is true for simple cases, where networks are composed of a restricted number of layer classes and where images are fairly simple, complex images with common state-of-the-art networks do not usually enjoy this property as one might hope. This paper shows that most of the existing convolutional architectures define, at initialisation, a specific feature importance landscape that conditions their capacity to attend to different locations of the images later during training or even at test time. We demonstrate how this phenomenon occurs under specific conditions and how it can be adjusted under some assumptions. We derive the P-objective, or PILCRO for Pixel-wise Importance Landscape Curvature Regularised Objective, a simple regularisation technique that favours weight configurations that produce smooth, low-curvature importance landscapes that are conditioned on the data and not on the chosen architecture. Through extensive experiments, we further show that P-regularised versions of popular computer vision networks have a flat importance landscape, train faster, result in a better accuracy and are more robust to noise at test time, when compared to their original counterparts in common computer-vision classification settings.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.