Paper detail

IISCNLP at SemEval-2016 Task 2: Interpretable STS with ILP based Multiple Chunk Aligner

Interpretable semantic textual similarity (iSTS) task adds a crucial explanatory layer to pairwise sentence similarity. We address various components of this task: chunk level semantic alignment along with assignment of similarity type and score for aligned chunks with a novel system presented in this paper. We propose an algorithm, iMATCH, for the alignment of multiple non-contiguous chunks based on Integer Linear Programming (ILP). Similarity type and score assignment for pairs of chunks is done using a supervised multiclass classification technique based on Random Forrest Classifier. Results show that our algorithm iMATCH has low execution time and outperforms most other participating systems in terms of alignment score. Of the three datasets, we are top ranked for answer- students dataset in terms of overall score and have top alignment score for headlines dataset in the gold chunks track.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.