Paper detail

Ignition from a Fire Perimeter in a WRF Wildland Fire Model

The current WRF-Fire model starts the fire from a given ignition point at a given time. We want to start the model from a given fire perimeter at a given time instead. However, the fuel balance and the state of the atmosphere depend on the history of the fire. The purpose of this work is to create an approximate artificial history of the fire based on the given fire perimeter and time and an approximate ignition point and time. Replaying the fire history then establishes a reasonable fuel balance and outputs heat fluxes into the atmospheric model, which allow the atmospheric circulation to develop. Then the coupled atmosphere-fire model takes over. In this preliminary investigation, the ignition times in the fire area are calculated based on the distance from the ignition point to the perimeter, assuming that the perimeter is convex or star-shaped. Simulation results for an ideal example show that the fire can continue in a natural way from the perimeter. Possible extensions include algorithms for more general perimeters and running the fire model backwards in time from the perimeter to create a more realistic history. The model used extends WRF-Fire and it is available from openwfm.org.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.