Paper detail

Identifying drivers of energy resolution variation in multi-KID phonon-mediated detectors

Phonon-mediated particle detectors employing Kinetic Inductance Detectors (KIDs) on Silicon substrates have demonstrated both O(10) eV energy resolution and mm position resolution, making them strong candidates for instrumenting next generation rare-event experiments such as in looking for dark matter or in neutrino measurements. Previous work has demonstrated the performance of an 80-KID array on a Si wafer, however current energy resolution measurements show a 25x difference between otherwise identical KIDs on the same wafer - between 5 to 125 eV on energy absorbed by the KID. Here, we use a first principles approach and attempt to identify the drivers behind the resolution variation. In particular, we analyze a subset of 8 KIDs using the unique approach of pulsing neighboring KIDs to generate signals in the target. We tentatively identify differences in quality factor terms as the likely culprit for the observed variation.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.