Paper detail

Identification of field dwarfs and giants in RAVE

The second RAdial Velocity Experiment (RAVE) Data Release (DR2) derives log g values but we present a simpler and cleaner method of identifying dwarfs and giants using only magnitudes, which does not require spectroscopic analysis. We confirm the Bilir et al. (2006) procedure which estimates the number of dwarfs and giants via their positions in the J-V two magnitude diagram by applying it to RAVE DR2. It is effective in estimating the number of dwarfs and giants at J-H>0.4 compared to RAVE's log g values. For J-H<=0.4, where dwarfs and subgiants show a continuous transition in the J magnitude histogram, we used the Besancon Galaxy model predictions to statistically isolate giants. The percentages of giants for red stars and for the whole sample are 85% and 34%, respectively. If we add the subgiants, the percentage of evolved stars for the whole sample raises to 59%. For the first time in the literature, we analysed the effect of CHISQ on RAVE's log g values (CHISQ is the penalised chi^2 from RAVE's technique of finding an optimal match between the observed spectrum and synthetic spectra to derive stellar parameters). Neither the CHISQ values nor the signal-to-noise ratio bias RAVE log g values. Therefore the method of identifying dwarfs and giants via the two magnitude diagram has been verified against an unbiased dataset.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.