Paper detail

Identifiability of restricted latent class models with binary responses

Statistical latent class models are widely used in social and psychological researches, yet it is often difficult to establish the identifiability of the model parameters. In this paper we consider the identifiability issue of a family of restricted latent class models, where the restriction structures are needed to reflect pre-specified assumptions on the related assessment. We establish the identifiability results in the strict sense and specify which types of restriction structure would give the identifiability of the model parameters. The results not only guarantee the validity of many of the popularly used models, but also provide a guideline for the related experimental design, where in the current applications the design is usually experience based and identifiability is not guaranteed. Theoretically, we develop a new technique to establish the identifiability result, which may be extended to other restricted latent class models.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.