Paper detail

Ideal structure of the C*-algebra of Thompson group T

In a recent paper Uffe Haagerup and Kristian Knudsen Olesen show that for Richard Thompson's group $T$, if there exists a finite set $H$ which can be decomposed as disjoint union of sets $H_1$ and $H_2$ with $\sum_{g\in H_1}π(g)=\sum_{h\in H_2}π(h)$ and such that the closed ideal generated by $\sum_{g\in H_1}λ(g)-\sum_{h\in H_2}λ(h)$ coincides with $C^*_λ(T)$, then the Richard Thompson group $F$ is not amenable. In particular, if $C_λ^*(T)$ is simple then $F$ is not amenable. Here we prove the converse, namely, if $F$ is not amenable then we can find two sets $H_1$ and $H_2$ with the above properties. The only currently available tool for proving simplicity of group $C^*$-algebra is Power's condition. We show that it fails for $C_λ^*(T)$ and present an apparent weakening of that condition which could potentially be used for various new groups $H$ to show the simplicity of $C_λ^*(H)$. While we use our weakening in the proof of the first result, we also show that the new condition is still too strong to be used to show the simplicity of $C_λ^*(T)$. Along the way, we give a new application of the Ping-Pong Lemma to find free groups as subgroups in groups of homeomorphisms of the circle generated by elements with rational rotation number.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.