Paper detail

Ice-Creams and Wedge Graphs

What is the minimum angle $α>0$ such that given any set of $α$-directional antennas (that is, antennas each of which can communicate along a wedge of angle $α$), one can always assign a direction to each antenna such that the resulting communication graph is connected? Here two antennas are connected by an edge if and only if each lies in the wedge assigned to the other. This problem was recently presented by Carmi, Katz, Lotker, and Rosén \cite{CKLR10} who also found the minimum such $α$ namely $α=\fracπ{3}$. In this paper we give a simple proof of this result. Moreover, we obtain a much stronger and optimal result (see Theorem \ref{theorem:main}) saying in particular that one can chose the directions of the antennas so that the communication graph has diameter $\le 4$. Our main tool is a surprisingly basic geometric lemma that is of independent interest. We show that for every compact convex set $S$ in the plane and every $0 < α< π$, there exist a point $O$ and two supporting lines to $S$ passing through $O$ and touching $S$ at two \emph{single points} $X$ and $Y$, respectively, such that $|OX|=|OY|$ and the angle between the two lines is $α$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.