Researcher profile

Rom Pinchasi

Rom Pinchasi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Computational Geometry Discrete Mathematics math.NT

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author

3works

0followers

3topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2013arXiv

The number of distinct distances from a vertex of a convex polygon

Erdős conjectured in 1946 that every n-point set P in convex position in the plane contains a point that determines at least floor(n/2) distinct distances to the other points of P. The best known lower bound due to Dumitrescu (2006) is 13n/36 - O(1). In the present note, we slightly improve on this result to (13/36 + eps)n - O(1) for eps ~= 1/23000. Our main ingredient is an improved bound on the maximum number of isosceles triangles determined by P.

preprint2012arXiv

Solving $a\pm b=2c$ in the elements of finite sets

We show that if $A$ and $B$ are finite sets of real numbers, then the number of triples $(a,b,c)\in A\times B\times (A\cup B)$ with $a+b=2c$ is at most $(0.15+o(1))(|A|+|B|)^2$ as $|A|+|B|\to\infty$. As a corollary, if $A$ is antisymmetric (that is, $A\cap(-A)=\est$), then there are at most $(0.3+o(1))|A|^2$ triples $(a,b,c)$ with $a,b,c\in A$ and $a-b=2c$. In the general case where $A$ is not necessarily antisymmetric, we show that the number of triples $(a,b,c)$ with $a,b,c\in A$ and $a-b=2c$ is at most $(0.5+o(1))|A|^2$. These estimates are sharp.

preprint2011arXiv

Ice-Creams and Wedge Graphs

What is the minimum angle $α>0$ such that given any set of $α$-directional antennas (that is, antennas each of which can communicate along a wedge of angle $α$), one can always assign a direction to each antenna such that the resulting communication graph is connected? Here two antennas are connected by an edge if and only if each lies in the wedge assigned to the other. This problem was recently presented by Carmi, Katz, Lotker, and Rosén \cite{CKLR10} who also found the minimum such $α$ namely $α=\fracπ{3}$. In this paper we give a simple proof of this result. Moreover, we obtain a much stronger and optimal result (see Theorem \ref{theorem:main}) saying in particular that one can chose the directions of the antennas so that the communication graph has diameter $\le 4$. Our main tool is a surprisingly basic geometric lemma that is of independent interest. We show that for every compact convex set $S$ in the plane and every $0 < α< π$, there exist a point $O$ and two supporting lines to $S$ passing through $O$ and touching $S$ at two \emph{single points} $X$ and $Y$, respectively, such that $|OX|=|OY|$ and the angle between the two lines is $α$.

Rom Pinchasi

Quick read

Decide how to stay connected

How to connect with this researcher

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

See the researcher in context

Building this graph slice

3 published item(s)

The number of distinct distances from a vertex of a convex polygon

Solving $a\pm b=2c$ in the elements of finite sets

Ice-Creams and Wedge Graphs