Paper detail

Hyperplane mass equipartition problem and the shielding functions of Ramos

We give a proof of the result of Edgar Ramos which claims that two finite, continuous Borel measures $μ_1$ and $μ_2$ defined on $\mathbb{R}^5$ admit an equipartition by a collection of three hyperplanes. Our proof illuminates one of the central methods developed and used in our earlier papers and may serve as a good `test case' for addressing (and resolving) the `issues' raised in the paper "Topology of the Grünbaum-Hadwiger-Ramos hyperplane mass partition problem", arXiv:1502.02975 [math.AT]. We also offer a degree-theoretic interpretation of the `parity calculation method' developed by Ramos and demonstrate that, up to minor corrections or modifications, it remains a rigorous and powerful tool for proving results about mass equipartitions.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.